
NEWS
Replacing welfare with a negative income tax would solve Osborne’s problems | Ben Southwood for Conservative Home
Head of research at the ASI, Ben Southwood, wrote for Conservative Home on why a negative income tax may be the solution to Osborne's tax credit problems.
Though barely anyone predicted it at the time, George Osborne’s 2015 budget looks like it will be defined not by his vaunted hiking and rebranding of the minimum wage, but by his massive cuts to tax credits. This is because everyone has suddenly realised that these cuts will take large sums of money—thousands of pounds in many cases—out of the pockets of blue-collar and sometimes Tory-voting workers.
Britain’s welfare system is overcomplicated, wasteful and counterproductive. In Free Market Welfare: A case for a Negative Income Tax, Michael Story makes the case for merging most working-age benefits, including tax credits, into a Negative Income Tax – a single, tapered payment that tops up the wages of the working poor and guarantees that work always pays.
ASI comments on new report "Free Market Welfare" feature in The Week
Ben Southwood, Head of Research at the Adam Smith Institute, has had his comments regarding the proposed tax credit cuts featured in The Week.
Some are even calling for this to be catalyst for more radical change. Writing in City AM, the Adam Smith Institute's Ben Southwood called for tax credits to be replaced by a "negative income tax""It might guarantee a monthly income of £700," Southwood writes. "For each extra £100 a person earns... they lose £50 of their initial £700 benefit. When their wages hit £700 they're getting £350 from the state, for a total of £1,050 - when their wages hit £1,400, they no longer get anything."
ASI report "Free Market Welfare" is featured in the Financial Times
The latest Adam Smith Institute paper, "Free Market Welfare: The Case for a Negative Income Tax", has featured in the Financial Times.
Two free market think-tanks, the Adam Smith Institute and the Institute of Economic Affairs, argue that the entire tax credit system should be dismantled and replaced with a simple “negative income tax” — a minimum guaranteed income that tapers away as earnings rise.Sam Bowman, the Adam Smith Institute’s deputy director, argued this would “radically simplify the welfare state and guarantee that everybody is better off in work”.
ASI comments on tax credit cuts feature in The Times
The Adam Smith Institute has featured in The Times for our criticism of the proposed tax credit cuts.
The chancellor had a greater ambition in mind, to create a “lower tax, lower welfare, higher wage economy”, as he told the Commons yesterday. Few oppose the principle but when both rightwing think tanks such as the Adam Smith Institute and the unions lambast the policy for deterring work, it’s clear the delivery is flawed.
Sam Bowman discusses tax credits and new ASI report "Free Market Welfare" on Sky News
Deputy Director of the Adam Smith Institute, Sam Bowman, was interviewed for Sky News on the proposed tax credit reforms and the ASI's new report "Free Market Welfare".
Sam Bowman discusses ASI report "Free Market Welfare" on LBC
Deputy Director of the Adam Smith Institute, Sam Bowman, discussed the ASI's latest report "Free Market Welfare: The Case for a Negative Income Tax" on LBC.
New ASI paper "Free Market Welfare" features in City AM
City AM wrote an article on the findings of the ASI's latest paper, "Free Market Welfare", which champions a negative income tax system as an alternative to the current tax credits scheme.
The government should replace all major welfare payments with “negative income tax”, an eyebrow-raising report from free market campaign group the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) has suggested.The radical negative income tax would pay out to British citizens in decreasing amounts until they reach a certain wage, when they would begin paying tax.
Britain’s welfare system is overcomplicated, wasteful and counterproductive. In Free Market Welfare: A case for a Negative Income Tax, Michael Story makes the case for merging most working-age benefits, including tax credits, into a Negative Income Tax – a single, tapered payment that tops up the wages of the working poor and guarantees that work always pays.
Sam Bowman discusses new ASI report "Free Market Welfare" on BBC Radio Wales
Deputy Director of the Adam Smith Institute, Sam Bowman, was interviewed for BBC Radio Wales on the government's proposed tax credit cuts, and argues that a negative income tax would be a better, simpler system of welfare.
In a report that we released today, we called on the government not to cut tax credits, but to simplify the system, and to simplify the benefits system in general into what some economists call a negative income tax.
Listen to the full interview here. (Starts 49:12)
Britain’s welfare system is overcomplicated, wasteful and counterproductive. In Free Market Welfare: A case for a Negative Income Tax, Michael Story makes the case for merging most working-age benefits, including tax credits, into a Negative Income Tax – a single, tapered payment that tops up the wages of the working poor and guarantees that work always pays.
ASI report "Free Market Welfare" has been featured by the Press Association
The Adam Smith Institute's latest paper "Free Market Welfare: The Case for a Negative Income Tax" has been featured by the Press Association, and in over 30 local papers.
Call for Negative Income Tax as Alternative to Tax CreditsThe Government should replace tax credits and other means tested benefits with a Negative Income Tax payment that is gradually withdrawn as people's earnings increase, a new report by a think tank has suggested.
Britain’s welfare system is overcomplicated, wasteful and counterproductive. In Free Market Welfare, Michael Story makes the case for merging most working-age benefits into a Negative Income Tax – a single, tapered payment that tops up the wages of the working poor and guarantees that work always pays.
ASI features in The Observer and The Independent for opposition to tax credit cuts
The Adam Smith Institute was featured in both The Observer and The Independent for our opposition to the government's tax credit cuts. From The Independent:
In an article for independent.co.uk, Seema Malhotra, the shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and Owen Smith, the shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, say: “It takes a master politician to unite the whole of the left of British politics with The Sun, The Spectator magazine, a sizable proportion of the new intake of Tory MPs, as well as the Bow Group and the Adam Smith Institute. So credit where it’s due to the Chancellor, who has pulled off that seemingly impossible feat with his plans to cut tax credits.
And in The Observer, Deputy Director of the ASI Sam Bowman was quoted:
And thats why even right wing thinktanks the Adam Smith Institute and the Institute for Economic Affairs, hardly the skivers' friends, criticised the policy last week: it will undermine work incentives. Sam Bowman of the ASI said: "The government has long claimed to want to make work pay for everyone, but cutting tax credits would disincentivise work and hurt those at the bottom of society."
Media contact:
emily@adamsmith.org
Media phone: 07584778207
Archive
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007